(urth) "been teaching literature for over 35 years"
dstockhoff at verizon.net
Mon Sep 9 05:46:22 PDT 2013
On 9/9/2013 8:42 AM, Gerry Quinn wrote:
>> In the late 1970s conception, a black hole is an
>> Einstein-Rosenbridge to somewhere else; Abbadon in Urth's case. It's
>> supposed to be literally sending part of the sun's substance and
>> generated energy *away*. The remaining star is diminished in output
>> per unit mess as well, as lighter stars are.
> It doesn't matter (in engineering terms) whether stuff that reaches
> the event horizon goes somewhere else or not (that's kind of the
> definition of an event horizon). But an accretion disk outside the
> Schwarzschild radius is just standard dynamics for any super-condensed
> object. At a distance of several Schwarzschild radii, Newtonian
> physics will be reasonably accurate (albeit not in detail).
Which is why I don't like the idea that the object has non-Newtonian
effects outside/beyond the Sun.
More information about the Urth