(urth) Gummed-Up Works or Got Lives?

[David Stockhoff]

Actually 'illiterate know-nothing' was a clinical assessment. ;)

But if you look closely, I was pointing out that Gerry uses his own 
illiteracy as evidence for his arguments. He really does. This 
observation is substantively different from an /ad hominem/ approach 
that would rightly be considered to degrade discussion.

On 12/16/2011 1:48 PM, Daniel Petersen wrote:
> Thanks for your generous interpretation of my comments, Lee.  I 
> actually am well known among family and friends as being the aggro one 
> at times - I have to fight hard with myself to be civilised in debate, 
> as I'm naturally a passionate, opinionated, snarky person (half the 
> time).  Some nasty scrap and scrape in a forum like this is indeed a 
> very good and healthy and enjoyable thing.  I have zero problem with 
> some feisty intellectual punch-ups happening here.  It's when the 
> insults start to sound pretty dark and vitriolic that I worry it's no 
> longer 'useful' and certainly not fun.  I may well have 
> misinterpreted, for example, Stockhoff calling Quinn and 'illiterate 
> know-nothing' and this is good debating-buddy language they use with 
> each other all the time (I have friends I argue with like that - 
> sometimes it crosses the line and we swear off each other for a while, 
> then make up and go at it again).
>
> Anyway, at least as much as that, I have problems with a more 
> intellectual obstinacy and obnoxiousness I sometimes see evident here. 
>  It's unfortunate, Lee, that I often have to just skim over or skip 
> the (usually lengthy) comments made by you and Gerry.  But that's what 
> I do rather than calling for you guys to be debarred.
>
> Two final notes:  I seriously doubt letting off steam on the internet 
> prevents it happening in real life.  I imagine there are complex 
> studies into these kinds of notions that show the whole thing is 
> dubiously unpredictable.  But that's merely an aside.
>
> The second thing is that I feel fairly uncomfortable with the idea of 
> people having 'goals' for this list.  What in the world?  (Like my 
> sanitary version of wtf?)  The list has a simple and stated purpose: 
>  to discuss Wolfe's works.  Let's leave it at that and be busy with it 
> - not trying to manipulate others and the 'community' toward further 
> ends we've concocted.  That's just weird.  Not in the good 'weird 
> fiction' way.  It's... creepy.
>
> -DOJP
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Lee Berman <severiansola at hotmail.com 
> <mailto:severiansola at hotmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     >Daniel Petersen:  I simply don't understand you very well, Lee,
>     and Quinn I feel I do
>     >understand to some degree but find his seeming obstinacy about....
>
>     You seem like a gentle, considerate soul Daniel, which I think is
>     great. But do you
>     believe in the adage, "it takes one to know one"? Gerry and I
>     understand each other very well.
>     I recognize him as a social manipulator and his retort to that is
>     to accuse me of the same.
>     Gerry, in his desire to win every debate, cannot admit to this
>     shortcoming but I appreciate
>     his honesty in not trying to deny his own mechinations.
>
>     I freely admit to it. My explicitly stated goal in rejoining this
>     list a couple years ago
>     was to restore a sense of freedom of expression, the lack of which
>     had previously stifled the
>     list for a number of years.  I have employed various strategems to
>     achieve this goal. Have I
>     suceeded at all?
>
>     I think your confusion about Gerry is that you underestimate and
>     oversimplify him. You wonder
>     why he employs certain strategies when they seem counterproductive
>     to what he is trying to
>     achieve. But, as I said, I don't consider him an object of pity.
>     Is it possible Gerry is
>     getting exactly what he wants from this list? Why else would he
>     continue his very consistent
>     pattern of communication?  Gerry also has goals for this list.
>     What are they? (I'll let him
>     answer) Has he succeeded?
>
>     >Nor do I think my comments betrayed that I was 'missing
>     something', especially
>     >not 'a recognition of human diversity'.  I am (they are) calling
>     for just such recognition and
>     >celebration of human diversity - belligerence
>     and'over-stubbornness' do not facilitate this.
>
>     I think I understand your point of view Daniel. It is a wonderful
>     one. Belligerence and pig-head
>     stubborness do cause a lot of problems in this world and it might
>     be a better place without them.
>     No fighting, no killing, no hate.
>
>     But the truth is, if we managed to eliminate those things, the
>     world would be a less diverse place.
>     Currently, aggression IS a part of the human experience and a
>     pervasive, influential one at that.
>     Much of my professional experience has been in what some might
>     call the "dregs" of society and I
>     have thus been quite familiarized with the dark side of human nature.
>
>     Though I've always preached a message of peace and understanding
>     in my work, I also came to know
>     that there are some people who are inherently aggressive. You
>     simply cannot reach such people
>     with a message of peace and understanding. It doesn't register. So
>     what should we do?
>
>     The answer is what societies throughout history have done with
>     such people. Channel the aggression
>     toward productive or at least harmless activities. Sports and
>     other competitions are a good
>     example.
>
>     So, I hope you can see what I'm saying. For some people, preaching
>     the use of respectful, considerate
>     language here is a lost cause. Instead, embrace the conflict.
>     Encourage the expression of hostility
>     in a place like this instead of in the real world. Not only does
>     the energy of competition drive
>     some people to do intense scholastic research they might not
>     otherwise do; it just might be making
>     the real world a more peaceful place by reducing domestic
>     violence, pub fights and perhaps even war.
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Urth Mailing List
>     To post, write urth at urth.net <mailto:urth at urth.net>
>     Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net