(urth) Silmarillion

[Dan'l Danehy-Oakes]

2010/7/7 António Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com>:
> Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote (07-07-2010 18:02):
>>
>> 2010/7/7 António Pedro Marques<entonio at gmail.com>:
>>
>>>> I would say that it was a deeply flawed book, however.
>>>
>>> Well, it wasn't a book.
>>
>> It is indeed a book. What it is not is a novel.
>
> The Quenta Silmarillion is an unfinished book, but why is it deeply flawed?

Try reading "Of Beleriand and its Realms" without falling asleep.


-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes