(urth) Silmarillion

[António Pedro Marques]

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote (07-07-2010 18:28):
> 2010/7/7 António Pedro Marques<entonio at gmail.com>:
>> Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote (07-07-2010 18:02):
>>>
>>> 2010/7/7 António Pedro Marques<entonio at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>>> I would say that it was a deeply flawed book, however.
>>>>
>>>> Well, it wasn't a book.
>>>
>>> It is indeed a book. What it is not is a novel.
>>
>> The Quenta Silmarillion is an unfinished book, but why is it deeply flawed?
>
> Try reading "Of Beleriand and its Realms" without falling asleep.

Is that a matter of not 'leav[ing] out the parts that people skip'?