Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote (07-07-2010 18:02): > 2010/7/7 António Pedro Marques<entonio at gmail.com>: > >>> I would say that it was a deeply flawed book, however. >> >> Well, it wasn't a book. > > It is indeed a book. What it is not is a novel. The Quenta Silmarillion is an unfinished book, but why is it deeply flawed?