aquastor at gmail.com
Wed May 17 13:11:29 PDT 2006
And you base your unequivocal conclusion upon...?
On 5/17/06, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ummm ... no. Baldy is not a "baby Abaia," he is a human who
> aspires to the state of Abaiahood. Given that Abaia seems to
> be a kind of demonic being, this is equivalent to saying that
> Baldanders is almost utterly corrupt. He is, I think, an example
> of the "secular sorceror" that affectionate uncle Screwtape
> tells his nephew will be Hell's ultimate achievement.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Urth