(urth) General Observation on Lupinologists (was Re: Urth before Earth)
aldenweer at charter.net
Thu Jul 20 10:44:29 PDT 2006
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
>I'm not going to try to reply to B's latest right now -- depression
>has drained me of energy -- but I do have a general observation
>to make, which was inspired by said post.
>On 7/19/06, b sharp <bsharporflat at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>... the Armstrong painting is one more by Fechin/Inire.
>I've come to realize that Wolfe interpreters tend to develop
>certain ... for want of a better word (obsession seems a
>touch too strong) crochets. I recognize two of my own: a
>tendency to see Christian/Catholic themes everywhere,
>and a belief that Wolfe is too tricksy for his own good. Others
>have harbored crochets about sentient trees, twin planets,
>and so on.
>One of yours seems to be seeing Father Inire in every
If we hadn't developed these 'crochets' I doubt we'd be subscribers to
this list. I'd much rather see these possibilities and readings pursued
(supported in some way, of course) and argued than limited or dismissed.
More information about the Urth