(urth) BOTNS is a classic

[Dan'l Danehy-Oakes]

Oh, it's fantasy all right. If you're just plain allergic to fantasy, skip
it. If you like the very best (like LotR), grab it NOW.

On 8/18/06, Jonathon McKitrick <jcm at freebsd-uk.eu.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 08:31:27AM -0700, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
> : I'll have to be a bit cautious about this: I found it far more _engaging_
> : than any of the Solar books (though Long Sun came close). I was
> : privileged to review THE KNIGHT for the NYRSF, and had trouble
> : actually _writing_ the review, because I didn't want to stop reading
> : and rereading the book -- the first time that had happened to me in
> : over thirty years, since I first read LORD OF THE RINGS in sixth
> : grade.
>
> Is it a true 'magic' book, sci-fi in disguise, or neither?
>
>
> Jonathon McKitrick
> --
> My other computer is your Windows box.
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>


-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes, writer, trainer, bon vivant
-----
http://www.livejournal.com/users/sturgeonslawyer
"Shovels are essential to the fantasy genre.
However, they are primarily used by the authors rather than the
characters." -- Stephen R. Donaldson