(urth) George R. R. Martin on Gene Wolfe

[Robin B. Smith]

I'll go to bat for Pirate Freedom :-)

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Gwern Branwen <gwern at gwern.net> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Nick Lee <starwaterstrain at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > They never bring up Wolfe, from what I've seen, and you would think he's
> the
> > perfect example. He's obviously Catholic and conservative, to a degree.
> See
> > arguments about this in the past of the List and recently on Reddit. He's
> > never won a Hugo despite numerous other accolades. You would think he'd
> be
> > their most damning evidence. So what gives?
>
> I saw this anti-Puppy argument previously brought up in, I think, a
> New Republic blog; they added on as another example R.A. Lafferty. It
> doesn't work because of the timing: the politicization of the Hugos
> and associated sites like Tor.com (still publishing a notorious
> cyberstalker because her politics & gender are correct, incidentally)
> only really starts hitting in force in the '90s and '00s.
>
> R.A. Lafferty wasn't even writing at that point, having given up until
> his unpublished stuff sold and then went to meet his maker, and Gene
> has still been writing but as much as I love his books, I would have a
> hard time making the case that any of _The Wizard Knight_, _Pirate
> Freedom_, _An Evil Guest_, _The Sorcerer's House_ or _Home Fires_
> *really* deserved to take home a Hugo for Best Novel. (Just compare
> the level of discussion on urth.net of any of those novels to that of,
> say, _Peace_ or even some of the short stories - having read through
> all of the hits for both, I think it's entirely possible that there
> has been more discussion here of the scant few paragraphs of "Suzanne
> Delage" than of the entirety of _Pirate Freedom_.)
> _The Long Sun_ was good and did manage to get some nominations, but
> also finished in '96 - or 19+ years ago now.
>
> Hence, Lafferty's and Wolfe's nominations and awards are uninformative
> since they either were in time periods where the Sad Puppies see
> minimal problems, or they are drawn from a time period where the
> relevant works did not exist / weren't clearly deserving of awards.
>
> --
> gwern
> http://www.gwern.net
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>



-- 
Robin B. Smith
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20150428/ffe58b97/attachment-0003.htm>