(urth) barrington interview
António Pedro Marques
entonio at gmail.com
Wed Oct 8 07:28:48 PDT 2014
Could you gentlemen pinpoint what you're labelling as the universality of math?
No dia 08/10/2014, às 15:01, "Norwood, Frederick Hudson" <NORWOODR at mail.etsu.edu> escreveu:
> This isn’t the place for this debate, since I have no doubt that Gene Wolfe accepts the fact that math is universal, but I will point out that your mode of debate (the suggestion that I don’t accept your assertion not because I disagree with it but because I find it “disturbing”) is, as Mr. Spock would say, “Highly illogical.”
>
> Rick Norwood
>
> From: Urth [mailto:urth-bounces at lists.urth.net] On Behalf Of Thomas Bitterman
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 9:36 AM
> To: The Urth Mailing List
> Subject: Re: (urth) barrington interview
>
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Lee <severiansola at hotmail.com> wrote:
> I've had this debate before and I know it can be disturbing to the purely science/mathematically
> minded. But math isn't really "universal". It a system of calculation created by the human mind
> which is part of a primate brain evolved from more primitive mammalian ancestors.
>
> Is there an argument against the universality of mathematics that isn't just the Genetic Fallacy?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20141008/e1a20451/attachment-0003.htm>
More information about the Urth
mailing list