(urth) resurrecting a 2002 thread that posits an alternative lineage for Sev

David Stockhoff dstockhoff at verizon.net
Mon Oct 6 10:46:58 PDT 2014

I can't argue with that. But I do think that for this eastern-mythical 
interpretation to really work, it must fit into---and be secondary 
to---some kind of Catholic incorporating/transforming structure.

On 10/2/2014 8:37 AM, Lee wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:35 AM, David Stockhoff <dstockhoff at verizon.net> wrote:
>> I agree. Marc's position has a point, in that incest which is neither intended nor known can't be much of a symbol.
> I disagree. For me, what is being missed is that the incest taboo applies to human beings. But for the pagan gods, incest was the norm and sexual activity outside the family, (with humans) was the more shameful act.

More information about the Urth mailing list