(urth) paleolithic, dendritic, and predendritic cultures

Marc Aramini marcaramini at yahoo.com
Wed Apr 3 16:10:05 PDT 2013

Of course it is.  Lots of ways.  So my book end summation is a mature maggot sits in jail and pretends to be a man replaced by a half tree aborigine.  Sounds like cliffs at its finest. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 3, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Jerry Friedman <jerry_friedman at yahoo.com> wrote:

> I took that to mean that their culture is based on trees (and wood and vines?) rather than stone.
> Jerry Friedman
> From: Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com>
> To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net> 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 9:02 AM
> Subject: (urth) paleolithic, dendritic, and predendritic cultures
> In an interview, Marsch claims that aboriginal culture is not paleolithic (first stone tools appearing) but rather the preceding stage, dendritic, or even predendritic.
> Well, there is no dendritic stage.  It is a branching of neurons, and in particular, branching like a tree.  It means of a branching form, arborescent.
> Some anthropologist Marsch is.
> _______________________________________________Urth Mailing ListTo post, write urth at urth.netSubscription/information: http://www.urth.net/
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20130403/284a8c58/attachment-0003.htm>

More information about the Urth mailing list