(urth) Seawrack and the Mother

Jeff Wilson jwilson at clueland.com
Mon Oct 1 09:16:54 PDT 2012


On 9/30/2012 12:12 PM, David Stockhoff wrote:
>
> On 9/30/2012 4:27 AM, Jeff Wilson wrote:
>> On 9/23/2012 5:27 PM, David Stockhoff wrote:
>>
>>> It doesn't quite fit. I meant (1) two sexes (a) separate or (b)
>>> combined, or (2) no sexes, but also pointing out that a single male or
>>> female seeder/birther/creator isn't really any of those. That is, you
>>> can't have only one sex. Incest is a bit like two-housed
>>> hermaphroditism, from this perspective.
>>
>>
>> I think you can have a single sexed creator if the created is the
>> other sex.
>>
> How would that work, exactly?
>
> ---If a female creator spawned (through parthenogenesis?) a male creation?
>
> ---Or if a female creation developed from a sperm cell?
>
> Parent-offspring incest would then follow. It's conceivable, but sounds
> deliberately perverse, like something Lovecraftian or Milton's Satan.

Are Galatea and Pygmalion incestuous?


-- 
Jeff Wilson - jwilson at clueland.com
Computational Intelligence Laboratory - Texas A&M Texarkana
< http://www.tamut.edu/CIL >



More information about the Urth mailing list