(urth) Inhumi's secret and numbers on blue

[DAVID STOCKHOFF]

If they are in essence dried-up or frozen wood, they would burn fast. But bright. Too bad we can't run an experiment---I've got lots of firewood behind my house.





>________________________________
> From: Jerry Friedman <jerry_friedman at yahoo.com>
>To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net> 
>Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:13 AM
>Subject: Re: (urth) Inhumi's secret and numbers on blue
> 
>> From: Lee Berman <severiansola at hotmail.com>
>>
>>>Andrew Mason:
>>>On the other hand Jahlee does seem to confirm the story and offer
>>>evidence, when she says:
>>>"If you lack endurance…" She shrugged. "Only your frozen corpse gets
>>>to Blue. It crosses the sky there, a little scratch of fire. No doubt
>>>you've seen them. I have."
>>
>>Grrrrrr!
>>
>>I am tempted to argue that a frozen Inhumi body surely lacks the mass
>>and density to create the visible light display we can see from a large
>>meteor, hundreds of miles up in the sky. Thus Jahlee is lying when she says
>>she's seen examples of Inhumi burning on re-entry...using real shooting star
>>sightings to bolster the lie...
>...
>
>Other way around--typical visible meteors are pebbles.  To judge by the
>Wikipedia article, inhumi meteors would probably reach the surface of
>Blue, though too broken-up to make craters.
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meteorite
>
>I agree that Jahlee is probably lying, though.  Most of the meteors Horn has
>seen would be natural (unless the Blue-Green system is short of debris or
>something).  I'd think inhumi meteors would be amazing fireballs in the visible
>and infrared ranges, not little scratches (great word).
>
>Jerry Friedman
>_______________________________________________
>Urth Mailing List
>To post, write urth at urth.net
>Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20121129/399afca3/attachment-0004.htm>