(urth) convo from a decade ago
gerry at bindweed.com
Sat May 5 06:31:50 PDT 2012
From: Daniel Petersen
> From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <ddanehy at siebel.com>
> In the case of the BOOK OF THE LONG SUN, we feel like we have
> the product of Stage 3, but the Narrator's comments in SHORT
> SUN lead us to wonder whether we might actually have a corrupt
> copy, and how corrupt?
And where is the following from?
> "What can we believe about this text or its contents? By itself,
> it is completely incapable of witnessing to its own veracity,
> and we are not even capable of coming to certainty on what the
> text actually does say in some places; yet many have believed
> and do believe that it is a true account of the most important
> thing that ever happened in this world. To believe that it is
> completely made up by its author or authors seems impossible;
> to believe that it is accurate, on a word-by-word, factual
> basis, seems even more impossible (though there are some
> extremists who in fact believe each of those things)."
- Gerry Quinn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Urth