(urth) Lupiverse(es)

[Lee Berman]

>Gerry Quinn: Only the other day you posted yet another of your inane rants 
>about me, which I ignored.
 
I don't think that's true. Perhaps you could post my inane rant to remind me?
 
>what you seem to ‘understand’ is some weird confection that has little relation 
>to the text
 
Perhaps that's so but then it applies to all those others with whom I happen 
to agree with. You do seem to be at war with a number of people here.
 
>Re-reading was intended as a helpful suggestion.  I should perhaps amplify it by 
>proposing that you concentrate on the meaning of the text as written and which you 
>frequently ignore in favour of cryptic clues allegedly hidden in the syllables and 
>such like.

I am pretty sure there is no amount of re-readings which would cause me to simplify
my understanding down to one level and/or force my interpretations to be into  
congruence with your own, which is what you seem to be aiming for.