(urth) Pike's ghost

[entonio at gmail.com]

No dia 2011/11/29, às 19:59, "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <danldo at gmail.com>  
escreveu:

> Gerry Quinn wrote:
>
>> If you can show an interpretation is wrong, you save others from  
>> being
>> misled by it.  Seems a good reason to point out the problem.
>
> What do you mean by "wrong" and "misled?" These seem to assume

It doesn't. 'X is wrong' is not the same as 'All but Y are wrong'.

> that
> there is a True Interpretation and all others are wrong, where I think
> that texts in general and Wolfe's texts in particular are polysemous
> and subject to a multitude of (apparently) contradictory
> interpretations, all based on the text.
>
> -- 
> Dan'l Danehy-Oakes
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net