(urth) Pike's ghost

[Dan'l Danehy-Oakes]

Gerry Quinn wrote:

> If you can show an interpretation is wrong, you save others from being
> misled by it.  Seems a good reason to point out the problem.

What do you mean by "wrong" and "misled?" These seem to assume that
there is a True Interpretation and all others are wrong, where I think
that texts in general and Wolfe's texts in particular are polysemous
and subject to a multitude of (apparently) contradictory
interpretations, all based on the text.

-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes