(urth) Like a good Neigbor

Lee Berman severiansola at hotmail.com
Mon Nov 21 11:47:27 PST 2011



> > James previously argued that he was a 
> > Neighbour who replaced Horn, and that fits okay with his theory. But 
> > if it can’t be that Neighbour, it must be someone else, and the 
> > question is who?
 
Sort of a silly question if the beings in question are plural in nature, not
individuals. We have a clear example of such in Tzadkiel.
 
>One body per soul, that kind of thing.  Sure, you can argue around it, and 
>say the Neighbour made a copy of himself and injected it into Horn as a new soul.
 
Not a copy. A shared portioning. Soul is like fire, maybe. A plasma-like substance.
It can be shared without losing any of itself. Surely when Tzadkiel breaks him/her
island-sized self into smaller giant, man, monkey and fairy sized portions, each 
one has a full measure of the original soul without loss by the original.
 
Horn died in the pit. No worries there. The discussion ought to be more on whether
a Neighbor shared its soul to facilitate the resurrection. I think James makes a
good case for this. Especially when a hooved, horned animal is involved.
 
Please no more talk of "which Neighbor". It clearly doesn't matter much. They share
a soul which burns about the same in all of them. Including within SilkHorn it
would seem. This shared soul would help explain dream travel.
  		 	   		  


More information about the Urth mailing list