(urth) Like a good Neigbor

[Lee Berman]

> > James previously argued that he was a 
> > Neighbour who replaced Horn, and that fits okay with his theory. But 
> > if it can’t be that Neighbour, it must be someone else, and the 
> > question is who?
 
Sort of a silly question if the beings in question are plural in nature, not
individuals. We have a clear example of such in Tzadkiel.
 
>One body per soul, that kind of thing.  Sure, you can argue around it, and 
>say the Neighbour made a copy of himself and injected it into Horn as a new soul.
 
Not a copy. A shared portioning. Soul is like fire, maybe. A plasma-like substance.
It can be shared without losing any of itself. Surely when Tzadkiel breaks him/her
island-sized self into smaller giant, man, monkey and fairy sized portions, each 
one has a full measure of the original soul without loss by the original.
 
Horn died in the pit. No worries there. The discussion ought to be more on whether
a Neighbor shared its soul to facilitate the resurrection. I think James makes a
good case for this. Especially when a hooved, horned animal is involved.
 
Please no more talk of "which Neighbor". It clearly doesn't matter much. They share
a soul which burns about the same in all of them. Including within SilkHorn it
would seem. This shared soul would help explain dream travel.