(urth) Like a good Neighbor

Marc Aramini marcaramini at yahoo.com
Sun Nov 20 12:03:35 PST 2011


No, you don't understand  how I came to the tree apotheosis theory, it was a rigorous crossreferencing that took months almost a decade ago, and it wasn't composed in haste.  I do not hastily propose anything.



--- On Sun, 11/20/11, Sergei SOLOVIEV <soloviev at irit.fr> wrote:

> From: Sergei SOLOVIEV <soloviev at irit.fr>
> Subject: Re: (urth) Like a good Neighbor
> To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
> Date: Sunday, November 20, 2011, 11:59 AM
> I agree with this - but as we see, my
> interpretation of concrete text is different
> of yours (we agreed to disagree). I think that open
> questions sometimes are
> more important that the answers suggested in haste - and so
> many theories
> come to suggest just that - answers, without meditation on
> the questions.
> 
> Sergei
> 
> Marc Aramini wrote:
> > What gets me is the points where the narrators ponder
> if they understand what they are saying: "I had to think
> about what I myself had just said ... it is possible no one
> understands" that leads me to believe they mysteries are
> soluble, not just open ended mysteries.  " I have given
> only scattered hints in spite of all my efforts"
> >  Those are metatextual statements that the
> structure is indicated through those scattered hints. 
> "not my words, not my words"
> > 
> > --- On *Sun, 11/20/11, Gerry Quinn /<gerry at bindweed.com>/*
> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >     From: Gerry Quinn <gerry at bindweed.com>
> >     Subject: Re: (urth) Like a
> good Neighbor
> >     To: "The Urth Mailing List"
> <urth at lists.urth.net>
> >     Date: Sunday, November 20,
> 2011, 11:39 AM
> > 
> >           
>    *From:* Marc Aramini
> >     <http://us.mc1618.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=marcaramini@yahoo.com>
> >          ****************
> >     > Uhh ... the chapter is
> titled "the end" and it says "the best
> >     part of my life was oveer.
> >          > The pit was its
> grave".  In addition, doesn't she say he was
> >     dead?  come on man
> >     > there are at least some
> disturbing deathly images.
> >          That’s why I
> qualified “indicates” with “strongly”.
> >          As for the first, he
> says the best part of his life was over,
> >     indicating that a worse part
> was to come.  And indeed, he spent
> >     days lying semi-conscious,
> thirsting and abandoned in a pit, then
> >     betrayed his family to the
> inhumi to get out, then not too long
> >     after got kidnapped to a hell
> planet and killed.  So it sounds
> >     like a fair assessment.
> >          Seawrack thought he
> was dead, but she, while she may have been
> >     born human, knows nothing of
> humans (*except* perhaps ones that
> >     are lured by sirens and are
> quickly killed).
> >          So yes, some deathly
> images.  But no reason to think he actually
> >     died then, IMO.
> >          - Gerry Quinn
> > 
> > 
> >     --- On *Sun, 11/20/11, Gerry
> Quinn /<gerry at bindweed.com>/*
> wrote:
> > 
> >         Horn didn’t
> die in the pit.  There’s nothing that strongly
> >         indicates that
> he did and a million things that make it
> >         obvious that he
> didn’t. 
> > 
> >     -----Inline Attachment
> Follows-----
> > 
>>    _______________________________________________
> >     Urth Mailing List
> >     To post, write urth at urth.net
> >     <http://us.mc1618.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=urth@urth.net>
> >     Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net <http://www.urth.net/>
> > 
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Urth Mailing List
> > To post, write urth at urth.net
> > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net



More information about the Urth mailing list