(urth) Chronology

[António Pedro Marques]

Good heavens, no. Everybody knows it was Karl. 

But we're not talking about the ephemeral last ruler of a long standing empire. We're talking about a major conqueror who founded an ephemeral empire. 

No dia 26/05/2011, às 16:56, DAVID STOCKHOFF <dstockhoff at verizon.net> escreveu:

> Rudolf?
> 
> --- On Thu, 5/26/11, Sergei SOLOVIEV <soloviev at irit.fr> wrote:
> 
>> From: Sergei SOLOVIEV <soloviev at irit.fr>
>> Subject: Re: (urth) Chronology
>> To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>, urth at urth.net
>> Date: Thursday, May 26, 2011, 11:31 AM
> If we take the empires in our own
>> recent past - destroyed
>> by social movements, revolutions etc. - and new states
>> born, seldom
>> the history of the Empire is studied, rather rejected
>> (except maybe in the state that feels itself
>> its successor). Take British Empire, queen Victoria and
>> India. Or Austro-Hungarian
>> Empire - its history is studied in Austria but not much by
>> Tcheks or Hungarians.
>> Who was their last Emperor? Do you remember?
>> 
>> Best
>> 
>> Sergei
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net