(urth) Sundial with "multitudinous faces"?

[James Wynn]

> Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
> If there's FTL travel then some aspect of relativity is untrue.

I understood that only traveling @Lightspeed that was contrary to 
relativity and that that was the problem wormholes were supposed to 
circumvent?

> Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
> The problem is _why_ time is different and
> can't be navigated at-will the way the other three dimensions can, and
> no satisfactory answer to that has yet been proposed.

Unless space-time is deterministic, in which case we only THINK we move 
through space at will.

J