(urth) do the Hierogrammates *care* about the megatherians?

[Jerry Friedman]

> From: James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com>

> 
> > Jerry Friedman:
> > Okay, is there an objection to the idea that  the "megatherian" human rulers 
>were
> > early rulers of Ascia? We don't know  why 17, but if there are 17 sea 
>creatures, we don't know why that
> > number  either.  (Other than the reference to the Politburo in either case,  
>or
> > the speculations in my previous post.)
> > 
> > It's true  that the relation of the present "Group of 17" to these 
>hypothetical
> > 17  founders is vague, but so is the relation of the present "Group of 17" to  
>the
> > hypothetical 17 sea creatures.
> 
> Well, my objection is  this.
> 
> It seems to me we agree that the term "megatherian" is *related* to  the giant 
>alien powers--because Abaia is called a "Great Beast". The only doubt  is 
>whether the term refers _directly_ to the alien powers.
> 
> The "17  stones" and "the Group of 17" are enumerated by human choice. Someone 
>decided  they should be that number. That leaves only the "17 megatherians" 
>_possibly_  NOT being humanly enumerated. So unless the number 17 is derived 
>from some  source unnamed in the book, it seems most likely that the 17 
>Megatherians is the  source of the other two.
> 
> True, it could be that 17 Megatherians and the  Group of 17 are somehow 
>equivalent (getting their name from an association with  the alien powers). But 
>that just adds a level of complication. You have to  suppose why the group of 17 
>got that name, how the government of the Ascians led  to a tradition in the 
>Commonwealth, and any additional issues of  speculation.
> 
> On the other hand, if one accepts that alien powers number  17 and are called 
>Megatherians because they are "like great beasts", then the  selection of the 
>number 17 elsewhere is self-explanatory.
> 
> It is  marginally easier (given the reference to Abaia as a Great Beast) to 
>decide the  alien powers are the Megatherians.
...

Thanks for the reply.  I think we'll have to disagree on what is simpler and 
what is more complicated, what is self-explanatory and what is a puzzle.  But we 
seem to agree that the difference between these two speculations isn't great.

On a related subject, thanks to Nick Gevers for bringing up the "Group of 
Seventeen" that ran the Dutch East India Company.

Jerry Friedman