(urth) Wolfe's brilliance or my denseness?

[António Pedro Marques]

No dia 23/05/2011, às 18:01, "Gerry Quinn" <gerryq at indigo.ie> escreveu:

> Readers who embrace too carelessly the impossible may therefore find themselves thinking that Wolfe is extraordinally ambiguous, whereas readers who dismiss too easily the unlikely may find them lacking in solutions.

+1 (I'm a dense reader myself, so I'm not implying my reading is the best)