(urth) NPR taking suggestions for The Best Science Fiction and

[Daniel Petersen]

You know, I actually did read On Blue's Waters, then stopped and went back
and read Long Sun before then re-reading Blue and the rest of Short Sun.  It
was indeed a very, very strange experience - but hugely enticing.
 Unfortunately it took away some of the mystery I think I would have
encountered in reading Long Sun if I had had no or little clue what was
coming.

I think John Clute wondered in a review whether jumping right into Wolfe at
Blue might be the best way.  I've always wondered the same.

DOJP



On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Andrew Mason <andrew.mason53 at googlemail.com
> wrote:

> Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:09 PM,  <entonio at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Ha. The Book of the Long Sun is so much better!
>
> > I agree. But is it better if you haven't read "Short Sun?" (I *think*
> > it is anyway, but I haven't experienced it in that order.)
>
> You read _Short Sun_ first? Was that not a rather puzzling experience?
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20110623/d55452c8/attachment-0003.htm>