(urth) Spiritual and Ecological Sucession

[Jeff Wilson]

On 1/11/2011 8:08 PM, Adam Thornton wrote:
> On 01/11/2011 08:03 PM, Gerry Quinn wrote:
>> From: "Lee Berman" <severiansola at hotmail.com>
>>>> Gerry Quinn: Fomalhaut seems to have gone red before its time for
>>>> some reason in BotNS
>>>> .......but there don't seem any obvious conclusions to draw from this.
>>> Unless you understand the reason Sol went red before its time.
>> We know why. But what has that to do with Fomalhaut? What obvious
>> conclusions can we draw? That there is a black hole in Fomalhaut too?
>>>> On the other hand, the unnamed star around which Blue and Green
>>>> orbit seems
>>>> to be doing fine. I don't see where a 'cosmic cycle' fits in with
>>>> regard to
>>>> the aging of contemporaneous stars.
>>> It's because you are missing the spiritual side of the cycle.
>> Feel free to explain how this "spiritual side of the cycle" causes
>> Fomalhaut to age rapidly.
>
> It's all in the post above. Fomalhaut is prematurely red because its
> inhabitants, like those of Urth, were Bad somehow, and provoked the
> Hieros into putting a black hole into the center of *their* sun too.
>
> The bestowing of the black hole is in response to the systems'
> inhabitants' spiritual deficiencies.
>
> Hey, I don't believe it either, but it's a consistent and
> not-difficult-to-follow theory, and textually-supported to the degree
> that we know Fomalhaut is inhabited and we know that some inhabited
> systems get black holes given to them for being Bad.

Where are we told they get black holes for being bad?

-- 
Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com
Computational Intelligence Laboratory - Texas A&M Texarkana
< http://www.tamut.edu/CIL >