(urth) Spiritual and Ecological Sucession

[Adam Thornton]

On 01/11/2011 08:03 PM, Gerry Quinn wrote:
> From: "Lee Berman" <severiansola at hotmail.com>
>>> Gerry Quinn: Fomalhaut seems to have gone red before its time for 
>>> some reason in BotNS
>>> .......but there don't seem any obvious conclusions to draw from this.
>> Unless you understand the reason Sol went red before its time.
> We know why.  But what has that to do with Fomalhaut?  What obvious 
> conclusions can we draw?  That there is a black hole in Fomalhaut too?
>>> On the other hand, the unnamed star around which Blue and Green 
>>> orbit seems
>>> to be doing fine.  I don't see where a 'cosmic cycle' fits in with 
>>> regard to
>>> the aging of contemporaneous stars.
>> It's because you are missing the spiritual side of the cycle.
> Feel free to explain how this "spiritual side of the cycle" causes 
> Fomalhaut to age rapidly.

It's all in the post above.  Fomalhaut is prematurely red because its 
inhabitants, like those of Urth, were Bad somehow, and provoked the 
Hieros into putting a black hole into the center of *their* sun too.

The bestowing of the black hole is in response to the systems' 
inhabitants' spiritual deficiencies.

Hey, I don't believe it either, but it's a consistent and 
not-difficult-to-follow theory, and textually-supported to the degree 
that we know Fomalhaut is inhabited and we know that some inhabited 
systems get black holes given to them for being Bad.

Adam