(urth) Sigh

Jeff Wilson jwilson at io.com
Wed Jan 12 07:46:10 PST 2011


On 1/12/2011 12:09 AM, Adam Thornton wrote:
> But of course that, in turn, assumes that all the copies of the library
> are complete. If we then postulate that any iteration of the library may
> or may not have a copy of a particular book then the number of (complete
> and partial) libraries our immortal traveler must traipse through before
> encountering repetition becomes the power set of the number of complete
> libraries, or 2 ^ ( 10 ^ ( 2.4548624015714 x 10 ^ 1834215 ) ) . This,
> rightly, seems like a big number.
>
> But, in fact, to an arbitrarily good approximation, *all* integers are
> bigger than that.

Really? I would've said a bit less than half.

-- 
Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com
Computational Intelligence Laboratory - Texas A&M Texarkana
< http://www.tamut.edu/CIL >



More information about the Urth mailing list