(urth) S&S vs. SF in BotNS

[David Stockhoff]

On 12/22/2011 2:04 PM, Antonin Scriabin wrote:
> Sorry to chime in kind of late, but I just wanted to say that, like 
> Gerry, I am content to leave notions of the soul (and many other 
> things) as mostly mysterious in Wolfe's books.  Wolfe tends to avoid 
> writing "hard science fiction" or straight allegory and never (at 
> least, as far as the books I have read go) offers explicit scientific 
> or spiritual explanation for some things.  The explanation of deep 
> space travel that Father Inire gives is as much mystical as 
> scientific, for example; whatever the "truth" is, it is so well hidden 
> behind the motives and understanding of Inire, Severian, and the other 
> speakers / narrators that it probably can't be uncovered.  Personally, 
> I get more out of the story /not/ knowing or pursuing the ins and outs 
> of the scientific or theological explanations that might hold for a 
> given phenomenon.  There is something distinctly otherworldly about 
> the /New Sun /books that makes trying to force the events therein into 
> the confines of 20th century physics or Catholic theology 
> inconsequential to my enjoyment of them.

I totally agree with this sentiment, but I see physics and theology as 
inspirations and jumping off points for Wolfe, not as restrictions. I do 
get the sense that they are wielded as such by some here. But I don't 
think talking about them is the same as enforcing them.