(urth) Drotte-Roche mixup

[entonio at gmail.com]

No dia 2011/04/17, às 21:28, David Stockhoff <dstockhoff at verizon.net>  
escreveu:

> And Tony is right that Drotte and Roche mean nothing to the reader  
> at this point, perhaps especially because the chapter might have  
> been insufficiently rewritten to make it serve as chapter 1.

I vehemently disagree. I think this kind of analysis is just what  
Wolfe as a writer has been working against since forever.