(urth) Standard Wolfean riddle

David Stockhoff dstockhoff at verizon.net
Tue Aug 17 04:29:50 PDT 2010


If you've been reading this thread carefully, yes.

António Pedro Marques wrote:
> David Stockhoff wrote:
>> António Pedro Marques wrote:
>>> David Stockhoff wrote (13-08-2010 01:52):
>>>> As for Yesod being before Briah,
>>>
>>> What would that mean? What would its opposite mean?
>>>
>>> I suppose you mean Yesod having 'gnabed into' Briah or a 'predecessor'
>>>  of Briah. But I don't think it can be put that way. Even if in our
>>> analogies there is a succession A -> B -> C, the '->' isn't really
>>> temporal, so it's more of something we use for our benefit than
>>> something which has true significance - i.e., A -> B doesn't really
>>> connect A to B.
>> I'm not sure why I'm being asked to explain something I don't think is
>> true.
>
> So we know what it is that you think is not true?
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
> ---
> avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.
> Virus Database (VPS): 100815-0, 08/15/2010
> Tested on: 8/15/2010 6:58:35 PM
> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2010 ALWIL Software.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>



More information about the Urth mailing list