(urth) Standard Wolfean riddle

António Pedro Marques entonio at gmail.com
Sun Aug 15 15:58:01 PDT 2010


David Stockhoff wrote:
> António Pedro Marques wrote:
>> David Stockhoff wrote (13-08-2010 01:52):
>>> As for Yesod being before Briah,
>>
>> What would that mean? What would its opposite mean?
>>
>> I suppose you mean Yesod having 'gnabed into' Briah or a 'predecessor'
>>  of Briah. But I don't think it can be put that way. Even if in our
>> analogies there is a succession A -> B -> C, the '->' isn't really
>> temporal, so it's more of something we use for our benefit than
>> something which has true significance - i.e., A -> B doesn't really
>> connect A to B.
> I'm not sure why I'm being asked to explain something I don't think is
> true.

So we know what it is that you think is not true?



More information about the Urth mailing list