(urth) Patera Incus

[Stuart Hamm]

 It is as clearly stated in the text for me as the question of
> whether there are inhumis on the Whorl.

I'd like to hear the answer to this one!

             
 
STUHAMM.COM
FACEBOOK/STUARTHAMM


     


--- On Mon, 8/16/10, Roy C. Lackey <rclackey at stic.net> wrote:

From: Roy C. Lackey <rclackey at stic.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) Patera Incus
To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
Date: Monday, August 16, 2010, 12:18 PM

At 04:45 CDT this date, James Wynn wrote:
>   Roy,
>
> I don't think you and I are going to come to an agreement about this.

 Agreed.

At 08:25 CDT this date, he wrote:
[snip]
> Consequently, because of
> the way I came to this conclusion, if Wolfe himself told me that Incus
> was not female, I'd call him a g d liar (not that I think that will
> happen). It is as clearly stated in the text for me as the question of
> whether there are inhumis on the Whorl.

And at 09:14 CDT this date he wrote:
> This is cool. I detailed why Incus is a woman for general informational
> edification, rather than for help working out the theory. As I said,
> it's a point of fact for me--beyond proving, debating, or working out.
[snip]

If nothing that I, or Wolfe, or anyone else *can* say can change your mind,
well, that speaks for itself. There is nothing left to say.

-Roy

_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write urth at urth.net
Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20100816/85458abc/attachment-0004.htm>