(urth) Hut in the Jungle

Craig Brewer cnbrewer at yahoo.com
Wed Mar 18 22:37:14 PDT 2009


Dizzying from one perspective. Underwhelming from another. Or I suppose both at once.

If you're right, then the upshot of this would be that myth (Prometheus) is a retelling "from the future" of a very worldly event, Baldanders creating Talos and eventually destroying himself, which comes to have "mythic" proportions by being "projected" through a past lens darkly. Is that right?

But why does it have to be "from the future"? What does that add to the idea that real events can be blown up into myths that resonate with meaning far from their original context? What's different about a myth's origin being in the future than in the past? (Apart from the coolness factor, I agree.)



----- Original Message ----
From: Son of Witz <sonofwitz at butcherbaker.org>
To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 12:31:05 AM
Subject: Re: (urth) Hut in the Jungle

no no.
It's not just "cute". it's fairly profound. it's literal, and it's a good example of why I've been saying the time loop is intractable.
Things in this story's past have their roots in it's temporal future.
I know it's a steady refrain from me, but Amphisbaena, Amphisbaena Amphisbaena.

He's suggesting they ARE Frankensein, and the "particular past event that Talos is referring to" is the writing of Frankenstein and other Promethean stories.
Dizzyingly awesome idea.
~witz

On Mar 18, 2009, at 10:06 PM, Craig Brewer wrote:

> 
> Fair enough. (Although it leaves the Frankenstein reference as just something "cute" to throw in there.)
> 
> Can you explain how it works here? Is there a particular past event that Talos is referring to that their present-as-future is affecting? Perhaps both? Is he suggesting that they're writing _Frankenstein_ at that moment? heh...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "brunians at brunians.org" <brunians at brunians.org>
> To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net>
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 12:02:39 AM
> Subject: Re: (urth) Hut in the Jungle
> 
> No, Talos (or Wolfe) meant that pretty literally. We discussed this when
> Wolfe and met in the mid 80's. John Cramer was also present. Gene and I
> found that we agreed that time was a certain way, which includes future
> events affecting the past in certain tricky ways.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> .
> 
>> Gwern, I see what you mean about those being two directions of the same
>> issue. But there's something else going on there, as well.
>> 
>> I always thought that Talos was really talking about myth and stories:
>> he's saying, "Hey, this is _Frankenstein_, but backwards!" And the point
>> is that myth shapes us, but we also move away from the original intent of
>> myths so that they are changed and distorted over time.
>> 
>> What happens in the hut seems less about myth and story than about
>> reflecting on the consequences of one's actions, but also realizing that
>> who we are may be the consequence of someone else's actions.
>> 
>> Both are about how, you're right, it's hard to pin down an "original"
>> cause or action. But they're dealing with different mechanisms: choices on
>> the one hand and myth/story on the other.
>> 
>> I'm not disagreeing with you. I'm just saying that there may be different
>> ways that they're thinking about the relationship between past and future.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Gwern Branwen <gwern0 at gmail.com>
>> To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 6:27:57 PM
>> Subject: Re: (urth) Hut in the Jungle
>> 
>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Son of Witz <sonofwitz at butcherbaker.org>
>> wrote:
>> ...
>>> and they feel the Tokoloshe, spirits from the future.
>>> "Don't you see they are only the results of what we do? They are the
>>> spiritis of the future, and we make them ourselves?"
>>> Is this just saying that the fallen state of Urth is contemporary
>>> Earth's doing, somehow?
>> ...
>>> /confused
>>> ~witz
>> 
>> I've always taken this as being the opposite of what is said in _Sword
>> of the Lictor_:
>> 
>> 'Dr. Talos whispered, "Look about you—don't you recognize this? It
>> is just as he says!"
>> "What do you mean?" I whispered in return.
>> "The castle? The monster? The man of learning? I only just thought
>> of it. Surely you know that just as the momentous events of the past
>> cast their shadows down the ages, so now, when the sun is drawing
>> toward the dark, our own shadows race into the past to trouble
>> mankind's dreams."
>> "You're mad," I said. "Or joking."
>> "Mad?" Baldanders rumbled. "You are mad. You with your fantasies
>> of theurgy. How they must be laughing at us. They think all of us
>> barbarians... I, who have labored three lifetimes."'
>> 
>> I've always loved that line: "our own shadows race into the past to
>> trouble
>> mankind's dreams."
>> 
>> The spirits of the future trouble the dreams of the present, and the
>> present make the results that lie in the future. Which was the
>> original? Neither, perhaps.
>> 
>> --
>> gwern
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net

_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write urth at urth.net
Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net



      



More information about the Urth mailing list