(urth) Questions about BNS

[Gwern Branwen]

On 2007.11.15 14:13:09 +1000, David Duffy <David.Duffy at qimr.edu.au> scribbled 0 lines:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Gwern Branwen wrote:
>
> > On 2007.11.14 13:26:21 -0600, Eric Ortlund <eortlund at briercrest.ca> scribbled 0 lines:

> As Agila says, I think they are reenactors.  They are not in our Africa:
> Isangoma uses an Australian aboriginal word for fishing spear, as well
> as Zulu terms, and mentions several our-now-extinct birds and animals.
> Rereading the mail plane description, it is a fixed wing propeller
> driven aircraft.  I don't know who Robert and Marie are, but it seems
> like we *should* know them.  I think they are Preceptor and -tress
> just because they are both missionaries.

Yes, but couldn't the terminology as easily be due to the translation of tBotNS into English? If they really are from the Commonwealth time, then 'our-now-extinct' birds and animals would be even more extinct and mythical. And as someone else pointed out, where would these re-enactors be getting Paris and all the rest from? Records from that period don't seem to be available in Severian's time; the present-day is just too long ago.

> Cheers, David Duffy
>
> PS About 1/3 through _Pirate Freedom_!

--
gwern
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20071115/4029d016/attachment-0004.pgp>