(urth) is Gene Wolfe among us?

[Transentient]

On May 22, 2006, at 7:09 AM, b sharp wrote:

> Just so it is clear, my original post in this thread was completely
> tongue-in-cheek.  If I really thought Roy was Gene Wolfe I wouldn't  
> out him
> in such a cavalier manner.  If there was any purpose to it, other  
> than play,
> it might be as a parable to warn against the dangers of seeking only
> positive evidence when trying to support a pet theory.

It would put Roy's general denouncement of Able and WK late last year  
in a new light...