(urth) Ending of The Knight

[Thomas Bitterman]

stilskin wrote:

> 
>--- Gregg <gwbest328 at RCN.COM> wrote:
>  
>
>>He didn't offer a definition of who "everyone else"
>>is to him. He didn't
>>seem particularly happy or unhappy that he is the
>>only one who thinks The
>>Wizard Knight is two books, either. It just seemed
>>obvious to him, but we
>>aren't getting it. A familiar situation for us, eh?
>>
>>    
>>
>
>I wouldn't be so quick to accept Wolfe's statements at
>face value here (or anywhere else, for that matter). 
>  
>
I took this as a joke.  "Everyone else" thinks it's one book for 
literary reasons.
He thinks it's two books because, well, physically there are two books.

>paul
>  
>
Enamel