(urth) Ending of The Knight

[Gregg]

>Message: 2
>Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:57:31 -0500
>From: "James Wynn" <thewynns at earthlink.net>
>Subject: Re: (urth) Ending of The Knight
>To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
>Message-ID: <016501c4f839$505134a0$4c1e4b0a at vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"

>>Mr. Wolfe said at Windycon this past year that he considers The Wizard
>>Knight to be two books, but he conceded that "everyone else" considers it
>>to be one book. Another case of his intentions being misunderstood, it
>>would seem.

>Hm. Well, okay. The Knight ends rather precipitously and unsatisfactorily
>for a stand-alone and the "series" is called "The Wizard Knight" which the
>opposite of the actual order. What can I say? Should I presume "everyone
>else" includes his editor? ;-)

>~ Crush

He didn't offer a definition of who "everyone else" is to him. He didn't
seem particularly happy or unhappy that he is the only one who thinks The
Wizard Knight is two books, either. It just seemed obvious to him, but we
aren't getting it. A familiar situation for us, eh?