(urth) Re: urth-urth.net Digest, Vol 5, Issue 15

[aqala at yahoo.com]

--- urth-urth.net-request at lists.urth.net wrote:

> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:57:56 -0800
> From: Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: (urth) Orwell on Chesterton
> To: The Urth Mailing List <urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
> Message-ID: <1f76173705011110571de36a2f at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> Aqala:
> 
> I am a great admirer of both Orwell and Chesterton, and a
> man who is converting to Catholicism in his 40s, after a
> great deal (more than ten years) of thought.May I ask why
> you feel it necessary to post something so inflammatorially
> insulting?
> 
> --Dan'l 

What is exactly insulting Orwell’s opinion or my own?
 To whom is it insulting? Chesterton has been dead many for a long time.
Why is it insulting? People has been denouncing religion and the church
for a long time now, nothing new there, like Robert Burns said:
Proud Priests and Bishops we'll translate
And canonise as Martyrs;
If not with swards than with words. If you find Orwell’s opinion (or mine)
insulting to YOU than that, sir, is your problem.




	
		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail