(urth) The Wizard - do not read until Jan 1
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes
danldo at gmail.com
Mon Jan 3 11:56:23 PST 2005
Actually I read Ormsby as "Of the Worm," i.e., Pendragon.
--Blattid
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 17:38:51 -0800, Don Doggett <harlekin at earthlink.net> wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> I'm moving to a new apt. so I'm posting early. I'll probably check my
> mail at the library but I don't know how much I'll be posting for a few
> weeks. There's plenty to be touched on in these two books but I'm
> going to give a few general observations and then hit on a very
> specific point. First the generalities: I think Wolfe erred in making
> Able a modern kid from America. It's the single thing that keeps this
> book from being a great work. It constantly pulled me out of the book
> and it says a lot for the power of the story itself that I invested
> major effort in forgetting Able's origins whenever possible. Still IMO
> it's a major flaw. Maybe this is my problem, but I doubt I'm alone in
> this. Also the first part of the Wizard with Toug and Mani in Utgard
> threatened to bog down the whole book. The story hits its stride when
> Able appears again though, and it achieves some very high points. I
> love Wolfe's characterization of Skai and its inhabitants. I wasn't so
> keen on his hierarchy of beings. Too reductionist for me, but GW let's
> me get around it by having fallible narrators. I would like to ask an
> open question. Is it useful to look at this work as a source of
> answers for themes in Wolfe's other works, especially NS, LS, and SS?
> I personally think it is but I don't want to bother going down that
> path if we have to argue whether it is indeed useful first. Did anyone
> else see Severian in the Black Caan? Because this is technically a YA
> novel, it seems to me that Wolfe was a little more straightforward in
> his themes and maybe it will shed some light on other books that have
> been murkier. There are still space creatures, giants, clones,
> artificial intelligences, and composite beings.
>
> Ok, the specific thing I want to post on is Able's real name, Arthur
> Ormsby. Anyone who has read GW knows that he doesn't hide a name for
> two books and reveal it in the utter last moment and not have it mean
> something. A big something I think. Someone (I think it was Marc)
> said that they wouldn't be surprised if Able and Arnthor turned out to
> be the same person in the end. I Think this is essentially correct.
> In my last post (and thank you for the kind words Charles) I said that
> I felt that Silkhorn was the ideal Silk of Horn's book of Silk, a Silk
> that the man of that name fell short of. Able says that he was raised
> up by the Aelf to be a messenger to Arnthor and that in order to
> deliver this message he had to be a worthy messenger. Hence his
> trials. This is wrong. Able isn't the messenger, he's the message.
> Able is the Aelf's rebuke to Arnthor, rubbing his face into how far
> short he has fallen. He carries Eterne (excalibur) a sword Arnthor
> can't even draw. His coat of arms bears a dragon. Shame is what
> causes Arnthor to imprison Able. I think that Wolfe is riffing off the
> idea of many versions of Arthur in history and legend. This recalls to
> me the scene in "The Last Temptation of Christ" (I haven't read the
> book) where the Jesus who saved himself from the cross confronts Paul
> and calls him a fraud. And Paul says he doesn't care who Jesus is, the
> people need someone and he would happily make up the whole story if
> necessary. Able is sort of that Pauline Jesus (Silkhorn too, for that
> matter) Anyhow, on to the name. Arthur is evident. Orm means "elm" so
> essentially Ormsby means "of the elm". This brings up several
> interesting associations. The first is that the elm (or Ailm) is an
> Aleph symbol (at least according to Graves, and even though Wolfe has
> said he was a crackpot, which is true, I'm certain he finds him
> thematically useful). Another is that the elm is a symbol of death.
> Recall that Able's new puppy is a white dog with red ears, a dog of the
> Goddess in her death aspect and one of the hounds of Annwyn as well (I
> think, but clearly a death symbol- by the way Farvan, as far as I can
> find, is another word for Pharaoh). Most interesting to me, one of the
> variants of the Death of Arthur has him being killed by a youth (who
> seems to be from faerie) on a horse wielding a spear made of the elm.
> I'm not sure why GW chose these associations, but I'm pretty sure
> they're not random.
>
> Regards
> Don
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
--
www.livejournal.com/users/sturgeonslawyer
Freedom has no barcode.
--J.G. Ballard
More information about the Urth
mailing list