<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    That's very interesting. I've read very little Milton outside PL, so
    I can't follow you too far. But you almost seem to be saying that
    Severian's "magic" is a <i>moral </i>or spiritual magic, not a
    physical or simply supernatural one---however one might characterize
    magic as we usually see it portrayed.<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/4/2012 12:08 AM, Craig Brewer
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:1349323722.26855.YahooMailNeo@web162805.mail.bf1.yahoo.com"
      type="cite">
      <div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times
        new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt">
        <div><span>Yeah, it's a common trope, but it helps me grind my
            Milton/Wolfe axe...at least in my head.</span></div>
        <div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-family:
          times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color:
          transparent; font-style: normal;"><br>
          <span></span></div>
        <div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-family:
          times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color:
          transparent; font-style: normal;"><span>As for the
            higher/lower, Wizard Knight is the main idea. But
            Briah/Yesod fit something along those lines. Honestly, it's
            Milton's monism that makes me find the most compelling
            connection to Wolfe. I've always wondered if there's a
            "theory" of fantasy/magic/supernatural/spiritual in Wolfe
            that is something like the monism Milton outlines in
            _Christian Doctrine_. The way Milton describes it, the moral
            character of a material body affects its spiritual capacity,
            which is an interesting way to explain the odd
            supernaturalism of Severian, say, or the Claw, which are
            "magical" but only in ambiguous ways.</span></div>
        <div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-family:
          times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color:
          transparent; font-style: normal;"><br>
          <span></span></div>
        <div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-family:
          times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color:
          transparent; font-style: normal;"><span>That's the kernel, at
            least. I haven't actually thought it through.<br>
          </span></div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times,
          serif; font-size: 12pt;">
          <div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times,
            serif; font-size: 12pt;">
            <div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial" size="2">
                <hr size="1"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b>
                DAVID STOCKHOFF <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:dstockhoff@verizon.net"><dstockhoff@verizon.net></a><br>
                <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> The
                Urth Mailing List <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:urth@lists.urth.net"><urth@lists.urth.net></a> <br>
                <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b>
                Tuesday, October 2, 2012 1:17 PM<br>
                <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b>
                Re: (urth) Seawrack and the Mother<br>
              </font> </div>
            <br>
            <div id="yiv143777722">
              <div>
                <div
                  style="color:#000;background-color:#fff;font-family:arial,
                  helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt;">
                  <div><span>Spirit (mind) is usually said to animate or
                      organize matter (body). This makes spirit active
                      (light) and matter passive (dark), which usually
                      translates to male and female principles, for
                      obvious reasons involving agriculture as well as
                      animal husbandry, never mind the convenience of
                      having both a sun and a moon to illustrate them.
                      So the two sexes are very useful as concepts for
                      ordering the universe. (You have to wonder how a
                      sentient species without sexes would view the
                      universe. Again, I can only think of the Elder
                      Ones . . . ugh.)<br>
                    </span></div>
                  <div style="color:rgb(0, 0,
                    0);font-size:13.3333px;font-family:arial, helvetica,
sans-serif;background-color:transparent;font-style:normal;"><br>
                    <span></span></div>
                  <div style="color:rgb(0, 0,
                    0);font-size:13.3333px;font-family:arial, helvetica,
sans-serif;background-color:transparent;font-style:normal;"><span>Wolfe
                      has a lot of beings inhabiting other bodies. But
                      he resists the archaic, sexist implications, in
                      that his "vessels" are always full and complete
                      characters, though he does tend to make the
                      genders of rider and mount match---not always.</span></div>
                  <div style="color:rgb(0, 0,
                    0);font-size:13.3333px;font-family:arial, helvetica,
sans-serif;background-color:transparent;font-style:normal;"><br>
                    <span></span></div>
                  <div style="color:rgb(0, 0,
                    0);font-size:13.3333px;font-family:arial, helvetica,
sans-serif;background-color:transparent;font-style:normal;"><span>I
                      can't think of any other particular examples of
                      "above" organizing "below," except perhaps in
                      Wizard/Knight.<br>
                    </span></div>
                  <div><br>
                    <blockquote style="border-left:2px solid rgb(16, 16,
255);margin-left:5px;margin-top:5px;padding-left:5px;">
                      <div style="font-family:arial, helvetica,
                        sans-serif;font-size:10pt;">
                        <div style="font-family:times new roman, new
                          york, times, serif;font-size:12pt;">
                          <div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial" size="2">
                              <hr size="1"> <b><span
                                  style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b>
                              Craig Brewer <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:cnbrewer@yahoo.com"><cnbrewer@yahoo.com></a><br>
                              <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">To:</span></b>
                              The Urth Mailing List
                              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:urth@lists.urth.net"><urth@lists.urth.net></a> <br>
                              <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Sent:</span></b>
                              Tuesday, October 2, 2012 10:45 AM<br>
                              <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Subject:</span></b>
                              Re: (urth) Seawrack and the Mother<br>
                            </font> </div>
                          <br>
                          Speaking of Milton, in the creation story of
                          PL, chaos/matter/nature are always feminine.
                          God implants order into the "womb of nature"
                          as he says. It's a matter more of imagery
                          rather than direct characterization, but still
                          interesting.<br>
                          <br>
                          Don't know how/if that applies to Wolfe. I've
                          always seen interesting analogies between
                          Milton and Wolfe (levels of
                          spirituality/sacredness, matter/spirit monism)
                          but the theologies shouldn't map onto each
                          other in the end for a variety of reasons.<br>
                          <br>
                          On Sep 30, 2012, at 12:12 PM, David Stockhoff
                          <<a moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
                            ymailto="mailto:dstockhoff@verizon.net"
                            target="_blank"
                            href="mailto:dstockhoff@verizon.net">dstockhoff@verizon.net</a>>
                          wrote:<br>
                          <br>
                          > <br>
                          > On 9/30/2012 4:27 AM, Jeff Wilson wrote:<br>
                          >> On 9/23/2012 5:27 PM, David Stockhoff
                          wrote:<br>
                          >> <br>
                          >>> It doesn't quite fit. I meant (1)
                          two sexes (a) separate or (b)<br>
                          >>> combined, or (2) no sexes, but
                          also pointing out that a single male or<br>
                          >>> female seeder/birther/creator
                          isn't really any of those. That is, you<br>
                          >>> can't have only one sex. Incest
                          is a bit like two-housed<br>
                          >>> hermaphroditism, from this
                          perspective.<br>
                          >> <br>
                          >> <br>
                          >> I think you can have a single sexed
                          creator if the created is the other sex.<br>
                          >> <br>
                          > How would that work, exactly?<br>
                          > <br>
                          > ---If a female creator spawned (through
                          parthenogenesis?) a male creation?<br>
                          > <br>
                          > ---Or if a female creation developed from
                          a sperm cell?<br>
                          > <br>
                          > Parent-offspring incest would then
                          follow. It's conceivable, but sounds
                          deliberately perverse, like something
                          Lovecraftian or Milton's Satan.<br>
                          >
                          _______________________________________________<br>
                          > Urth Mailing List<br>
                          > To post, write <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            rel="nofollow"
                            ymailto="mailto:urth@urth.net"
                            target="_blank" href="mailto:urth@urth.net">urth@urth.net</a><br>
                          > Subscription/information:
                          <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.urth.net/">http://www.urth.net/</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
                          Urth Mailing List<br>
                          To post, write <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            rel="nofollow"
                            ymailto="mailto:urth@urth.net"
                            target="_blank" href="mailto:urth@urth.net">urth@urth.net</a><br>
                          Subscription/information: <a
                            moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
                            target="_blank" href="http://www.urth.net/">http://www.urth.net</a><br>
                          <br>
                          <br>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
            <br>
            _______________________________________________<br>
            Urth Mailing List<br>
            To post, write <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              ymailto="mailto:urth@urth.net" href="mailto:urth@urth.net">urth@urth.net</a><br>
            Subscription/information: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="http://www.urth.net/" target="_blank">http://www.urth.net</a><br>
            <br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:urth@urth.net">urth@urth.net</a>
Subscription/information: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.urth.net">http://www.urth.net</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>