Don't get me wrong - I don't encounter 'lows' in Wolfe terribly often. Maybe 'mids' a bit more. <div><br></div><div>I think one 'low' or 'mid' would be when his narrative loses its drive - last book of Long Sun is surely a classic example (a series I totally love regardless of that - and the very ending picks up again). I haven't analysed how or why this happens. </div>
<div><br></div><div>Another low or mid would be the 'coldness' that many have remarked in Wolfe's viewpoint or voice or something - it's alienating somehow to the reader. E.g.: <a href="http://examinedlife.typepad.com/johnbelle/2003/10/gene_wolfe.html">http://examinedlife.typepad.com/johnbelle/2003/10/gene_wolfe.html</a>.</div>
<div><br></div><div>To some degree this is just something to get used to - or was for me, and then I actually began to feel a lot of warmth in certain ways at certain times - most especially from the likes of Silk and Horn. Anyway, it's not really a low or a flaw - it's more a 'trade off' for other marvels and joys Wolfe gives. Not every writer can achieve every literary effect.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I just finished <i>Castleview</i> the other day and some of the dialogue in there is a true low in Wolfe to me. (Many highs are in there as well.) In fact, dialogue and the way people speak tend to be proving grounds in Wolfe's craft where he either shines in genius and skill or practically falls on his face. </div>
<div><br></div><div>-DOJP<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Sergei SOLOVIEV <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:soloviev@irit.fr">soloviev@irit.fr</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
What are the "lows" of Wolfe, to your opinion?<br>
<br>
Sergei Soloviev<br>
<br>
Daniel Petersen wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Wolfe definitely considered himself a significant step below Laff.<br>
I can only attribute this to modesty and a failure to outgrow youthful enthusiasm (much as I haven't outgrown Tolkien). <br>
<br>
I don't think it was 'youthful' for Wolfe - they both had their first stuff published in the 1960s - Wolfe just barely behind Laff. If I set aside my hyperbole (and my personal preference for Lafferty overall over Wolfe overall), then I'd say they actually match for me in terms of literary greatness - they both have their incredible highs and lows and if I place the very best of each right next to each other - it can be pretty close at times. (Lafferty's still a level above.) Hey! How'd that get there? Can't control my parenthetical thoughts just now.<br>
<br>
-DOJP<br>
<br>
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Jerry Friedman <<a href="mailto:jerry_friedman@yahoo.com" target="_blank">jerry_friedman@yahoo.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:jerry_friedman@yahoo.com" target="_blank">jerry_friedman@yahoo.<u></u>com</a>>> wrote:<br>
<br>
>On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Marc Aramini<br>
<a href="mailto:marcaramini@yahoo.com" target="_blank">marcaramini@yahoo.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:marcaramini@yahoo.com" target="_blank">marcaramini@yahoo.com</a>><u></u>> wrote:<br>
>>--- On Tue, 4/17/12, Daniel Petersen<br>
<a href="mailto:danielottojackpetersen@gmail.com" target="_blank">danielottojackpetersen@gmail.<u></u>com</a><br>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:danielottojackpetersen@gmail.com" target="_blank">danielottojackpetersen<u></u>@gmail.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
>>>And Tim Powers, two steps below Laff literarily, and ONE<br>
BELOW Wolfe,<br>
Oh no no. Lafferty has "beautiful moments and bad quarters of an<br>
hour."<br>
>>>I think is very worth checking out for another highly original<br>
Catholic writer of wonderfully bizarre fiction.<br>
<br>
I did like /Last Call/ a great deal. Not /On Stranger Tides/ so much.<br>
>>Oh my! Well, I will admit Lafferty is a genius, but his failure<br>
to sustain a long narrative<br>
Or even a short narrative.<br>
>>of such consistently high quality definitely leads me to the<br>
opinion that Wolfe is the more disciplined and consistent writer. Perhaps some of his stylistic explorations were more mundane, but<br>
...........<br>
>><br>
>>okay, different strokes for different folks.<br>
<br>
Apparently.<br>
>From: Daniel Petersen <<a href="mailto:danielottojackpetersen@gmail.com" target="_blank">danielottojackpetersen@gmail.<u></u>com</a><br>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:danielottojackpetersen@gmail.com" target="_blank">danielottojackpetersen<u></u>@gmail.com</a>>><br>
><br>
>Heh, heh, knew I'd raise some hackles. I totally agree that<br>
Wolfe is the more disciplined writer (maybe also more consistent)<br>
No, Lafferty's pretty consistent, at least on the scale of fifteen<br>
minutes or more.<br>
> - it's just that Lafferty's fiction, at its best, speaks forth<br>
like something primal<br>
I'd have said the other way around.<br>
>- his main roots are oral and I think that might be what makes<br>
the main difference - that being the voice for his wildly<br>
unbelievable and amazing worldview. Also, though, the more you<br>
read him the more you realise the INCREDIBLE verbal control he<br>
often has - his best fiction is very tight and disciplined and<br>
exquisitely well honed and crafted - really surpassing the best of<br>
Wolfe I think. Wolfe definitely considered himself a significant<br>
step below Laff.<br>
I can only attribute this to modesty and a failure to outgrow<br>
youthful enthusiasm (much as I haven't outgrown Tolkien).<br>
>However, I have no qualms with people thinking them equal or<br>
reversed. I can't expect everyone to have the gifted insight into<br>
literature I (and Wolfe) possess.<br>
<br>
And Damon Knight, apparently.<br>
><br>
>-DOJP<br>
>:)<br>
Yep.<br>
Jerry Friedman<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Urth Mailing List<br>
To post, write <a href="mailto:urth@urth.net" target="_blank">urth@urth.net</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:urth@urth.net" target="_blank">urth@urth.net</a>><br>
Subscription/information: <a href="http://www.urth.net" target="_blank">http://www.urth.net</a><br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<u></u>------------------------------<u></u>------------<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Urth Mailing List<br>
To post, write <a href="mailto:urth@urth.net" target="_blank">urth@urth.net</a><br>
Subscription/information: <a href="http://www.urth.net" target="_blank">http://www.urth.net</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Urth Mailing List<br>
To post, write <a href="mailto:urth@urth.net" target="_blank">urth@urth.net</a><br>
Subscription/information: <a href="http://www.urth.net" target="_blank">http://www.urth.net</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>