<HTML><HEAD></HEAD>
<BODY dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: small; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; TEXT-DECORATION: none">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt tahoma">
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<DIV style="font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=severiansola@hotmail.com
href="mailto:severiansola@hotmail.com">Lee Berman</A> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3 face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: small; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; TEXT-DECORATION: none"><STRONG><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #f5f5f5" size=2 face=Tahoma></FONT></STRONG>
<DIV><BR>> Another assumption is that there is a one true God who is perfect
and <BR>> choiceless and unchanging. As you suggest, any perceived changes
or<BR>> personification of such a God (including calling it "He") are false.
They<BR>> are simply projections of human imperfection on a perfect God. But
this <BR>> means all religions are equally valid and/or equally false.
Hindus, Christians <BR>> and animists are all equally human and thus equally
right and wrong about the <BR>> unknowable perfection of the "real" God. How
could one group of humans have<BR>> a better grasp of the infinite than
another?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The same way that one group of humans could have a better grasp of science,
or economics, or poker, or any other unsolved matter. To say that the
unknowability of absolute truth renders all views equally valid is the silly end
of relativism.<BR> <BR>- Gerry Quinn</DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>