<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Try some of his short stories and novellas:<br>
<br>
Photogen and Nycteris (aka Day Boy & Night Girl, aka Son of the
Day, Daughter of Night)<br>
Light Princess (aka Little Daylight)<br>
Golden Key<br>
Translations for Novalis<br>
<br>
Lewis and MacDonald never met. But Lewis credited MacDonald's
fiction as an important element in his conversion. He (and the
reception of his children) were important in the publication of
Alice in Wonderland. Although he was a pastor for a time, his
sermons and theology got him in trouble and he was eventually pushed
out.<br>
<br>
J.<br>
<br>
On 3/16/2012 8:09 AM, David Stockhoff wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4F633B9F.7000203@verizon.net" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
I'm not sure which of MacDonald's books I consider stilted and
boring, although I encountered those as an adult. But I loved the
Curdie books my mom read to me when I was four or five. <br>
<br>
On 3/15/2012 10:51 PM, Craig Brewer wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:1331866272.35596.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times
new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt">
<div><span>Phantastes was a beautiful book! Never besmirch the
name of MacDonald! heh heh...<br>
</span></div>
<div><br>
<span></span></div>
<div><span>As someone who was raised in a relatively
a-religious family, I usually just ignored the obviously
religious bits of Lewis/Tolkien/whoever else. But as I got
older, I found that the non-"preachy" manner of fictional
Christian works actually worked to explain why faith was
interesting and attractive. After all, here was some
fantasy that might be real on a certain level, or at least
a number of people thought so.</span></div>
<div><br>
<span></span></div>
<div><span>That's a perspective I've had trouble explaining to
friends who had that "betrayal" reaction to Narnia.</span></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times,
serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times,
serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial" size="2">
<hr size="1"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b>
David Stockhoff <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:dstockhoff@verizon.net"><dstockhoff@verizon.net></a><br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> The
Urth Mailing List <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:urth@lists.urth.net"><urth@lists.urth.net></a>
<br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b>
Thursday, March 15, 2012 9:42 PM<br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b>
Re: (urth) Lupiverse(es)<br>
</font> </div>
<br>
On 3/15/2012 10:32 PM, António Pedro Marques wrote:<br>
> Wasn't MacDonald a good half century older? And he
was one of those mollified Presbyterians.<br>
> But is it fair to criticise didacticism which didn't
pretend to be anything else? I mean, neither MacDonald nor
Lewis, that I know of, tried to present their books as
doctrinally free. At least MacDonald was overt as to their
didactic nature. It isn't Lewis's fault if the Narnia
books got popular that they were pushed everywhere as mere
children's books without a caveat that they were had a
religious undercurrent. Maybe the real issue is that they
are popular because that undercurrent pleases people, just
as Praise of Empire pleased others, and those who take
exception to that way of writing resent the popularity.<br>
<br>
Well, if it's boring, it's boring. And it depends on what
you mean by "didn't pretend"---as with Lewis, most of his
readers were children. If you have no idea what you might
be reading, you can't know whether it's pretense or not.<br>
<br>
Certainly Lewis wasn't responsible for whatever marketing
got his books in my local library and into my hands. But I
doubt they were and are popular because they are
religious: rather, they probably are popular because they
are accessible, imaginative (sometimes magical, as you
said), action-packed, well-written, comforting (Aslan
always appeared to set things right), and morally
nonthreatening. Girls read them as much as boys did, and
no parents objected to them.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Urth Mailing List<br>
To post, write <a moz-do-not-send="true"
ymailto="mailto:urth@urth.net"
href="mailto:urth@urth.net">urth@urth.net</a><br>
Subscription/information: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.urth.net">http://www.urth.net</a><br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:urth@urth.net">urth@urth.net</a>
Subscription/information: <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.urth.net">http://www.urth.net</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:urth@urth.net">urth@urth.net</a>
Subscription/information: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.urth.net">http://www.urth.net</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>