<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.292969); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ">No dia 13/03/2012, às 20:10, "Gerry Quinn" <<a href="mailto:gerry@bindweed.com">gerry@bindweed.com</a>> escreveu:</span></div><div><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<div> </div>
<div style="FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: small; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; TEXT-DECORATION: none">
<div style="FONT: 10pt tahoma">
<div> </div>
<div style="BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<div style="font-color: black"><b>From:</b> <a title="entonio@gmail.com" href="mailto:entonio@gmail.com">António Pedro Marques</a> </div>
<div><font size="3" face="Calibri"></font> </div></div></div>
<div></div>
<div style="FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: small; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; TEXT-DECORATION: none">Gerry
Quinn wrote (13-03-2012 15:44):<br>> > The “Failed Jesus” of every
previous iteration is just one problem. What<br>> > about iterations
*subsequent* to the one with the Incarnation? Either that<br>> > is
the last iteration (which is nowhere suggested) or the subsequent<br>> >
iterations are better than that one... and yet they also must have some
sort<br>> > of Failed Jesus or Post Jesus rather than the one true Jesus
Christ. How<br>> > can that be?<br><br>> There isn't a
requirement that iterations are linearly comparable.</div></div>
<div>
<div style="FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: small; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; TEXT-DECORATION: none"> </div></div>
<div>
<div style="FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: small; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; TEXT-DECORATION: none">Not
quite sure what you mean by that, but the passage describing the iterations goes
as follows:</div></div>
<div>
<div style="FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: small; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; TEXT-DECORATION: none">“As
the flower that comes is like the flower from which it came, so the universe
that comes repeats the one whose ruin was its origin; and this is as true of its
finer features as of its grosser ones: The worlds that arise are not unlike the
worlds that perished, and are peopled by similar races, though just as the
flower evolves from summer to summer, all things advance by some minute
step.”</div>
</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>There is no requirement there that each iteration will be better than the preceding one, either in average, in totality or in parts. One summer, the flower that comes may be the best flower that will ever come. Next summer's may advance minutely into decadence. </div><div><br></div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><div><div>> > Also, if ours is the final, perfect iteration... well, it
seems like it<br>> > ought to be a little bit better, doesn’t it?
Really, the universe of Urth<br>> > despite various SF horrors doesn’t
seem especially terrible compared to our<br>> > imaginings of this one, or
even our history.<br><br>> Again, in our universe Humanity has *just* reched
the stage where knowledge, <br>> including religious knowledge, becomes
globalised. It's quite different from <br>> a universe which is long past
that stage. Either something good is to come <br>> out of a globalisation of
our knowledge and values or it isn't. The latter <br>> view is relativistic,
imo.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>It reached/will reach the same stage in past and future iterations
also.</div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><br><div>That has nothing to do with the fact that you're comparing an Earth at the beginning of its journey with an Urth at the end of its own. Heck, it's as if I was saying nonagenarian artist X hadn't achieved much and you countered that our own just-out-of-high-school teen artist Y hadn't achieved much either. Then I point out Y is barely beginning and you counter that X has had a beginning too!</div></body></html>