<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 11/5/2011 11:24 AM, James Wynn wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4EB56346.1050404@gmail.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:B741F6CC010B4CDFBD0C4F5C6CA043F9@Rover"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE:
12pt">
<div>
<div style="FONT: 10pt tahoma">
<div style="BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<div style="font-color: black"><b>From:</b> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
title="marcaramini@yahoo.com"
href="mailto:marcaramini@yahoo.com">Marc Aramini</a>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div> </div>
<font face="Arial" size="2">He corrected me that Blue was
most definitely not Urth. Is such a correction
necessary in metaphor? I asked him if Silk passing
through the same passage that the ship in UotNS past
through would result in him winding up on past Urth from
it's future (Blue), and his response was, No, no, NO!
Green is Urth.<br>
</font></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Wait! So shouldn't Green be Urth's *past*?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
No. Never mind. I see your point.<br>
</body>
</html>