<HTML><HEAD></HEAD>
<BODY dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: small; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; TEXT-DECORATION: none">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt tahoma">
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<DIV style="font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=severiansola@hotmail.com
href="mailto:severiansola@hotmail.com">Lee Berman</A> </DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: small; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; TEXT-DECORATION: none">
<DIV><BR>> Hm. Advanced physics technology comes from the angels while
advanced</DIV>
<DIV>> biological technology comes from witches and undersea monsters.
Could </DIV>
<DIV>> this reflect an engineer's prejudice regarding the sciences?
Though I was </DIV>
<DIV>> a bio-science major myself I could imagine an engineering
student's<BR>> preference for the nice, clean confines of a physics lab over
the smelly </DIV>
<DIV>> funk of a bio-lab. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I doubt whether Wolfe would worry too much about the distinction. Both
sides use the alzabo glands, for example. Typhon uses high
technology. And for all I know, the undersea monsters may be driven by
nanotech rather than some alien biology. Their technology may be so
advanced it is not recognised as such.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>- Gerry Quinn</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>