I was indeed brought up in a very religious household, with all of those things you mentioned; I didn't take the apparent reference to Christ to be anything more than a secular adjustment of present-day myths for a far-future Urth. Our entire mythology, Christian or otherwise, is condensed to some bizarre miasma in the dying Sun days; whatever resemblance they have to present Christianity is the result of cultural evolution. It seems to me that Holy Catherine (sp? I don't have the book in front of me) isn't even a religious figure; just a left-over tradition from long ago that the Guild retains for tradition's sake. Despite initial impressions, I think it becomes clear that the Conciliator is not Christ (or a type of Christ), and when you read what Wolfe wrote about concerning the "translation" of TBONS, it becomes further clear that references to saints, the use of Latin, etc., are just contrivances by the "translator" to make the story accessible to the reader. We aren't supposed to think that they are actually referring to "saints" as we know them; the word "saint" is just supposed to the closest equivalent for the purposes of translation. <br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Marc Aramini <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marcaramini@yahoo.com">marcaramini@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td style="font: inherit;" valign="top"><div><div></div><div class="h5"><div><br><br>--- On <b>Fri, 10/14/11, Antonin Scriabin <i><<a href="mailto:kierkegaurdian@gmail.com" target="_blank">kierkegaurdian@gmail.com</a>></i></b> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px;"><br>
<div>When does Silk see Jesus? I vaguely remember something like that; perhaps in his meditations on the Outsider he comes to such a conclusion? <br><br>The Severian-as-a-type-of-Christ stuff isn't as obvious to me. Severian is not divine, and not in charge; he gives the appearance of both of these, however, only because as the Conciliator he is wrenched forward and backward in time by entities more powerful than him. He is used as a pawn to usher in the New Sun at the expense of (presumably) most of the life on Urth, but this seems a decidedly un-Christlike salvation to me. There are superficial similarities between Christ and Severian (male, human yet more than human, prophesied, etc.) but there differences enough that I see treating Severian as allegorical to Christ as a desservice to the complexity of his character, and the story. Rather, Severian seems a sort of perversion of what we consider Christ-like and
heroic; Severian is decidedly flawed, mundane, and unaware of himself in time, his role, and his powers for the majority of the story. When he becomes an amalgamation of the past Autarchs and Thecla, he doesn't even retain a singular identity anymore; this is also very unlike Christ.<br>
<br></div>
<div>On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Marc Aramini <span dir="ltr"><<a href="http://us.mc1618.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=marcaramini@yahoo.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">marcaramini@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><br>It's infinitely clear in New Sun that the Conciliator is a syncretic blend of a historical Christ and the legendary possibilities of his return, after-Christ, but it only becomes obvious in Urth how that syncretism comes about (robert and maria are missionaries, Silk sees Jesus, etc. etc., Jesus exists in the Solar Cycle, and Severian is not him though he may reenact portions of the Christian passion (as does Tzadkiel, for that matter). Sev's whole trial indicates that it is imitation and substitution at work in the salvation effort, he doesn't even bear the sacrificial burden there.</td>
</tr></tbody></table>
<div><br> </div>
<div> </div></blockquote></blockquote>
</div></div><div>Most assuredly it is because when you read the opening of Shadow of the torturer the conciliator is a blatant rip of Christ from the middle ages: seen with his dark halo, called the greatest of good men. The New Sun hinted at early are clearly Parousia Christ legends.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>It just so happens somehow Sev, while hinting all along that he is the New Sun and Concialiator (The conciliator might be at this party with Cyriaca and not even know it! Oh yeah, that's me!) actually becomes them. Making the previous hints that the cociliator was Christ seem less solid.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I think if you grow up reading religious texts and seeing all the drawings and lives of the saints and going to mass in a fancy stain glass cathedral or basilica you would naturally naturally assume the conciliator was christ from those early descriptions, for sure. </div>
<div>Also, everybody is named after saints! clearly an attempt at a religious manuscript. </div>
<div> </div></td></tr></tbody></table><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Urth Mailing List<br>
To post, write <a href="mailto:urth@urth.net">urth@urth.net</a><br>
Subscription/information: <a href="http://www.urth.net" target="_blank">http://www.urth.net</a><br></blockquote></div><br>