<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:FE29A96CFDB444B087CA2217D7AA8179@jill"
type="cite"><font face="Arial" size="2">
<div>
<div>
<div>> James Wynn wrote:<br>
> While browsing a used bookstore yesterday, I happened
upon </div>
</div>
</div>
<div>> "New Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology" for which
Graves </div>
<div>> wrote introduction. There was an interesting article
entitled </div>
<div>> "Pan, Aristaeus, Priapus" which for me confirms that
Silk a </div>
<div>> clone of Typhon and that Tussah was also a clone of
Typhon. </div>
<div> </div>
<div><font><font face="Arial" size="2">Gerry Quinn wrote:<br>
</font></font>Making Tussah a liar about the "son not born
of my body". <br>
</div>
</font></blockquote>
<br>
Not at all since I say Silk is most directly a clone of Fish not
Typhon. But I say Fish was a clone of Typhon.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:FE29A96CFDB444B087CA2217D7AA8179@jill"
type="cite"><font face="Arial" size="2">
<div> But aside from that, wouldn't at least one of the
councillors (who knew Tussah and were lookoing for his son)
have made some comment to the effect that he looked
identical? or wouldn't somnebody else who knew Tussah?</div>
</font></blockquote>
<br>
I think Remora knew Silk was a clone. Thus his visit and
conversation about embryos. Probably the Ayuntamiento did too. But
Silk was young with hair and a scruffy beard. Tussah was bald and
much older. That's a pretty good disguise.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:FE29A96CFDB444B087CA2217D7AA8179@jill"
type="cite"><font face="Arial" size="2">
<div>I think I'll stick to the conventional approach in which
the meaning of a book is found in that book and not some
completely other book that says stuff that don't make sense in
the context of the first one!</div>
</font></blockquote>
<br>
As you like. <br>
<br>
u+16b9<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>