<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:4CFD5478.6010802@gmail.com" type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><font face="Arial" size="2"><font face="Times New Roman"
size="3">James Wynn-<br>
You might as well ask why it is legitimate for merely
human Horn to to cut</font></font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2"><font face="Times New Roman"
size="3">a deal with the Neighbors on behalf of the whole
human race. The answer is,<br>
it wouldn't be.</font></font></div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<font face="Arial" size="2">Gerry Quinn-<br>
Not for humans. My assumption here was that the Neighbours have
different customs related to such agreements; perhaps they are
more communally-minded than humans.</font><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
So...the deal-making was farce? The Rajan (who really just Silk
after all) will go on to the Whorl and Neighbors will soon discover
that their bargain is not worth the paper it wasn't written on?<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:4CFD5478.6010802@gmail.com" type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><font face="Arial" size="2"><font face="Times New Roman"
size="3">James Wynn-<br>
</font></font><font face="Arial" size="2"></font>HORN, the
resurrected Horn, is the only being in the universe that is
100%
<div>human and 100% Neighbor.</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<font face="Arial" size="2">Gerry Quinn-<br>
</font><font face="Arial" size="2">If your theory is true, he
seems to me more like the Manchurian Candidate in this regard!</font><font
face="Arial" size="2"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></font></font><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I seem to be having a problem clarifying homoneius. Still, I'll try
to get the rest of my response out tonight, and hopefully it will be
clearer. Although, I'm sensing that you're reading them only to come
up with quick objections and reponses chosen for their supposed wit
rather than than insightful understanding. <br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:4CFD5478.6010802@gmail.com" type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><font face="Arial" size="2"><font face="Times New Roman"
size="3">James Wynn-<br>
</font></font>He's much more of a legitimate CHRIST-figure<font
face="Arial" size="2"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></font></font>.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<font face="Arial" size="2">Gerry Quinn-<br>
</font><font face="Arial" size="2">He's some kind of mystical
figure all right, although I don't recall any incidents from the
Gospels in which Jesus lured troops onto minefields, or raised
vampires as terror weapons. (Seems more like a bit of old Pas
coming out to me.)</font><font face="Arial" size="2"></font><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
You read the part where I said "Not equivalent to Christ as Aslan
is" right? <br>
I don't see much Pas-like in saving a town from tyranny. <br>
Still, not everything in the New Testament is "gentle Jesus meek and
mild".<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:4CFD5478.6010802@gmail.com" type="cite"> <font
face="Arial" size="2">Gerry Quinn-<br>
</font><font face="Arial" size="2">Also, he continues to worship
the Outsider - how does that fit in?</font><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
It works just fine for Arminianist theology. And, in fact, it is not
ignored in Augustinian Trinitarian doctrine either.<br>
<i>"I keep asking that _the God of our Lord Jesus Christ_ , the
Father of glory, may give to you a spirit of wisdom and of
revelation in the knowledge of Him." _Ephesians 1:17</i><br>
<br>
And he is a Christ figure on multiple levels. As
three-persons-in-one, he is a picture of God Himself.<br>
<br>
u+16b9<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>